Ingredient & price dossier / U.S. beauty and personal careSnapshot 2026-11-02
A pumice-based physical scrub with a peptide and ceramide tail, 11,684 ratings at 4.6, five failed free-from claims, and a price record that could not be recovered.
- 01Product information
- 02Rating and customer voice
- 03Ingredients
- 04Price and history
- 05Product gallery
- 06Data notes
01Product information
| Product name | DRMTLGY Microdermabrasion Scrub |
|---|---|
| Brand | DRMTLGY |
| ASIN | B076KYPY23 |
| Category path | Beauty & Personal Care > Skin Care > Face > Treatments & Masks > Microdermabrasion |
| Size / format | 2 fl oz / 57 g jar, pack of 1 |
| Marketplace | Amazon US, delivery ZIP 10001, native USD |
| Snapshot date | 2026-11-02 |
A rinse-off physical facial scrub in a 2 fl oz jar. The exfoliant is pumice, carried in a cream base of water, glycerin, caprylic/capric triglyceride, dimethicone and four fatty alcohols, with a three-peptide complex, a two-ceramide complex and four fruit and leaf extracts behind it. The listing calls the scent unscented and the finish polished; the declaration nonetheless carries a fragrance at position 38, which is why the fragrance-free claim fails below.
Use is wet the face, apply a small amount avoiding the eye area, massage for about 30 seconds, rinse, then follow with a mask for 10 to 15 minutes. The listing labels the texture gritty and the after-feel smooth, and asks buyers to patch test. No exfoliation frequency and no timeline for visible change is stated anywhere on the page.
How the listing positions it
- Gentle Exfoliation with Pumice Granules: Experience a luxurious exfoliation with our microdermabrasion scrub, featuring non-abrasive pumice granules to gently buff away dead skin cells, revealing a smoother complexion.
- Smooth and Softened Skin: Our facial exfoliating scrub offers enriched ingredients that soften and smooth the skin, enhancing natural beauty, ensuring a refined texture with each use for a radiant glow.
- Improved Skin Tone and Texture: Addresses uneven skin tone and texture, making it a top choice for beautiful skin care. Provides gentle physical exfoliation while reducing fine lines.
- All natural ingredients including sugar cane extract (glycolic acid), green tea leaf extract, lemon fruit extract, and apple fruit extract. Parabens, sulfates and cruelty free.
- Clean Formula Made in the USA: All DRMTLGY products are formulated right here in the USA. Please patch test before applying, if you experience allergic reactions to this product, stop using it immediately.
Specification sheet
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Brand | DRMTLGY |
| Item Form | Scrub |
| Skin Type | All, Combination, Dry, Oily, Sensitive |
| Product Benefits | Exfoliating, Improves Appearance of Dull Skin, Leaves Skin Soft and Polished, Smoothening, Supports Better Skincare Absorption See more |
| Material Feature | Natural |
| Item Volume | 2 fluid ounces |
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Item Weight | 3.1 ounces |
| Unit Count | 2 Ounce |
| Size | 2 Ounce (Pack of 1) |
| Product Dimensions | 2.38 x 2.38 x 2 inches; 3.1 ounces |
| Item model number | 5724 |
| UPC | 045905995372 |
| Manufacturer | Neutraderm |
| ASIN | B076KYPY23 |
| Best Sellers Rank | #2,954 in Beauty & Personal Care; #2 in Facial Microdermabrasion Products |
02Rating and customer voice
The star distribution and the language buyers use to justify it are two different kinds of evidence. The first is arithmetic and can be read off a chart. The second is qualitative and only carries weight where enough people repeat it. Neither is pushed past what the product page actually published.
Shape of the rating
| Band | Share of ratings | Implied count | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 star | 77% | 8,997 | delighted, repeat-purchase intent |
| 4 star | 13% | 1,519 | satisfied, small reservations |
| 3 star | 6% | 701 | mixed, the swing group |
| 2 star | 2% | 234 | disappointed on a stated promise |
| 1 star | 2% | 234 | failed outright for this buyer |
Five-star ratings outnumber one-star ratings by 38.5 to 1. A ratio this wide means the modal buyer is not merely tolerant of the formula, they are enthusiastic about it; the one-star tail still matters because it usually names a single mechanism that failed.
| Average rating | 4.6 / 5 |
|---|---|
| Total ratings | 11,684 |
What buyers say, in aggregate
Customers find this exfoliating scrub effective and gentle, noting it's not too harsh on the skin and can be used daily. The product receives positive feedback for its appearance, making skin look brighter and glowing, with one customer mentioning it provides medical-grade benefits at a fraction of the cost. The fine grains receive mixed reviews - while some find them perfect, others report bad reactions.
Aspect-level sentiment
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Negative | Positive share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| effectiveness | 1711 | 1572 | 139 | 92% |
| skin feel | 1014 | 956 | 58 | 94% |
| gentleness | 496 | 398 | 98 | 80% |
| value for money | 405 | 341 | 64 | 84% |
| skin appearance | 211 | 185 | 26 | 88% |
| fragrance | 201 | 179 | 22 | 89% |
| fine grains | 165 | 152 | 13 | 92% |
| skin irritation | 165 | 106 | 59 | 64% |
Read mentions and share together. A 95% positive share on four mentions is an anecdote; a 70% share on two hundred mentions is a pattern.
Customer voice
Verbatim review text did not render on the captured product page, so no quotation appears here. The aggregate summary and the aspect table above are the published substitutes. Nothing has been written on a reviewer's behalf, and no sample quotation has been reconstructed from memory.
03Ingredients
41 declared ingredients were merged into one roster and graded on three axes: comedogenic risk, irritation risk and overall safety. On all three, a lower number is safer. The level assigned to an ingredient is the highest of its three grades, so a single severe flag is never averaged away by two benign ones. Where the two reference databases disagree, the higher figure is kept and the spread is disclosed in the notes.
What’s inside
A dashed tag is a failed claim, not a marketing variant: the formula does not meet that standard. A solid ink tag means the formula meets it on the declared list.
Count by level
| Level | What it means | Count | Share | Representative members |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | no known comedogenic or irritant activity | 3 | 7.3% | Glycerin, Titanium Dioxide, Polysorbate 80 |
| 1 | low risk, generally well tolerated | 2 | 4.9% | Dimethicone, Glyceryl Stearate |
| 2 | mild watch item, patch test if reactive | 3 | 7.3% | Cetyl Alcohol, Stearyl Alcohol, Cetearyl Alcohol |
| 3 | caution band, relevant for acne-prone skin | 1 | 2.4% | Ceteareth-20 |
| 4 | high concern, limit or avoid if reactive | 1 | 2.4% | Ethylhexyl Palmitate |
| n/r | not graded by either database | 31 | 75.6% | Water/Aqua/Eau, Pumice, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, Ceramide EOP +25 more |
“Not graded” is missing data, not a clean record. Commodity vehicles and botanical blends routinely carry no grade in either database, and an absent grade must never be read as a zero.
Functional families
The family split is taken from the first stated function of each ingredient. It shows what the formula is mostly made of, which is usually a better guide to how it feels than the front-of-pack claim list.
Ingredients that carry a flag
| # | Ingredient | Function | Comedogenic | Irritancy | Why it is listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Ethylhexyl Palmitate | Emollient | 2-4 | 0 | comedogenic grade 2-4 |
| 10 | Ceteareth-20 | Cleansing | 2 | 3 | irritancy grade 3 |
A grade describes the ingredient in isolation, not this product. Position in the list matters: a flagged ingredient at the end of a long declaration is present at a far lower concentration than one near the front.
Declared benefits and the size of the supporting cast
| Benefit | Ingredients | Mechanism as stated |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrating | 4 ingredients | Boosts hydration and relieves dry, tight skin. |
| Scar Healing | 3 ingredients | Improves the look of marks and scars. |
| Anti-Aging | 2 ingredients | Softens lines and helps skin look youthful. |
| Brightening | 2 ingredients | Restores radiance to dull, tired skin. |
| Good For Oily Skin | 2 ingredients | Balances oil and helps reduce shine. |
| Reduces Large Pores | 2 ingredients | Minimizes the look of enlarged pores. |
| Barrier Repair | 2 ingredients | Strengthen and restore your skin's natural barrier. |
| Acne Fighting | 1 ingredient | Fights acne and helps prevent breakouts. |
| Reduces Irritation | 1 ingredient | Eases discomfort and supports skin resilience. |
| Redness Reducing | 1 ingredient | Soothes visible redness and calms irritation. |
| Skin Texture | 1 ingredient | Smooths rough patches and refines texture. |
Class-level concerns
| Concern | What it means |
|---|---|
| May Trigger Acne | Can clog pores or trigger breakouts. |
| May Worsen Oily Skin | May increase shine or excess oil. |
| May Worsen Eczema | May worsen itching or irritation for eczema. |
| May Worsen Rosacea | Can trigger flare-ups in rosacea-prone skin. |
These are class-level warnings: the formula contains ingredients capable of the stated effect. They are not a prediction about any individual user, and a patch test on the inner forearm remains the only cheap way to resolve them.
Key ingredient groups
- PHA — 1 ingredient(s). Gently exfoliates and hydrates with less irritation.
- Antioxidants — 1 ingredient(s). Shields skin from free radical damage.
- Exfoliators — 1 ingredient(s). Removes dead skin cells to smooth texture.
Declaration, in order
Order follows the label. Ingredients below roughly the one-percent mark may be listed in any order, so the tail of this list carries position information that is weaker than it looks.
Complete graded roster
| # | INCI name | Function | Comedo | Irrit | Safety | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water/Aqua/Eau | Solvent | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 2 | Pumice | Abrasive | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 3 | Glycerin | Humectant | 0 | 0 | EM | 0 |
| 4 | Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride | Masking | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 5 | Cetyl Alcohol | Emollient | 2 | 2 | EM | 2 |
| 6 | Dimethicone | Emollient | 1 | 0 | EM | 1 |
| 7 | Stearyl Alcohol | Emollient | 2 | 2 | EM | 2 |
| 8 | Ethylhexyl Palmitate | Emollient | 2-4 | 0 | EM | 4 |
| 9 | Titanium Dioxide | Cosmetic Colorant | 0 | 0 | EM | 0 |
| 10 | Ceteareth-20 | Cleansing | 2 | 3 | EM | 3 |
| 11 | Cetearyl Alcohol | Emollient | 2 | 1 | EM | 2 |
| 12 | Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1 | Peptide | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 13 | Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7 | Peptide | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 14 | Ceramide EOP | Barrier lipid | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 15 | Ceramide NP | Barrier lipid | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 16 | Palmitoyl Tripeptide-5 | Peptide | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 17 | Ceramide AP | Barrier lipid | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 18 | Phytosphingosine | Barrier lipid | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 19 | Cholesterol | Barrier lipid | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 20 | Citric Acid | pH Adjuster | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 21 | Tocopheryl Acetate | Antioxidant | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 22 | Butylene Glycol | Solvent | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 23 | Sodium Lauroyl Lactylate | Emulsifying | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 24 | Carbomer | Viscosity Control | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 25 | Polysorbate 20 | Emulsifying | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 26 | Citrus Aurantium Dulcis (Orange) Fruit Extract | Skin Conditioning | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 27 | Citrus Medica Limonum (Lemon) Fruit Extract | Skin Conditioning | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 28 | Pyrus Malus (Apple) Fruit Extract | Skin Conditioning | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 29 | Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract | Antimicrobial | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 30 | Saccharum Officinarum (Sugarcane) Extract | Moisturising | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 31 | Glyceryl Stearate | Emollient | 1 | 0 | EM | 1 |
| 32 | Gluconolactone | Chelating | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 33 | Sodium Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer | Emulsion Stabilising | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 34 | Isohexadecane | Emollient | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 35 | Sodium Benzoate | Masking | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 36 | Xanthan Gum | Emulsifying | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 37 | Polysorbate 80 | Emulsifying | 0 | 0 | EM | 0 |
| 38 | Fragrance (Parfum) | Masking | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 39 | Lithium Magnesium Sodium Silicate | Viscosity Control | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 40 | Tetrasodium EDTA | Chelating | EM | EM | EM | — |
| 41 | Blue 1 (CI 42090) | Cosmetic Colorant | EM | EM | EM | — |
The roster is the 41-ingredient declaration in label order, joined to one grading source. The second grading database was unreadable on this run, so no ingredient here carries a second opinion and the safety column is empty on every row. Thirty-one of 41 rows are ungraded: fifteen because the grading record omits them entirely, including every peptide and every ceramide the listing markets, and sixteen because the grade cells are blank. Two rows carry a flag - ethylhexyl palmitate at comedogenic 2 to 4, read at its upper bound, and ceteareth-20 at irritancy 3. Ungraded is missing data, never a zero.
04Price and history
Everything below is native USD against a U.S. delivery address. No currency has been converted and no value has been estimated. The history block covers the whole monitoring record rather than a rolling window, so a low from two years ago still counts.
Price history by channel
| Price type | Lowest ever | Highest ever | Current | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No channel returned a record | No lowest, highest, current or average figure was published to this capture for any price type, so none has been filled in, back-filled or estimated. | |||
| Amazon | No record for this channel | |||
| 3rd Party New | No record for this channel | |||
| 3rd Party Used | No record for this channel | |||
No historical price channel answered for this product on the capture date, so the table above carries no history. The comparison below therefore uses the price points that the live listing itself published, each with its own reading.
The published price ladder, compared
| Price point | USD | Basis | Vs one-time price |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-time price | $20.00 | 2026-11-02 | +0.0% |
| Subscribe & Save | $17.00 | 15% off | -15.0% |
These are simultaneous quotes from one page, not a time series. The gap between the list anchor and the one-time price is the printed discount; the gap to the subscription price is what the retailer pays for a repeat commitment.
05Product gallery
Listing imagery reproduced in the order it appears on the product page, three plates to a row.



06Data notes
- No review text was captured. The inline review block did not render on the desktop product page, the mobile page was not served, and the dedicated review endpoint returned a login wall. The section shows the aggregate rating, the distribution and the published aspect summary only, and no quotation has been reconstructed.
- No buyer photos were captured. The listing rendered no customer image tiles on any captured page, so the gallery holds the three listing photographs only. Listing imagery was not substituted for buyer imagery.
- No historical price record was captured, so the price-history table in section 04 lists all three channels as having no record: no all-time low, high, average or dated extreme exists for this product in this report. Three routes to the historical price source returned a CDN challenge page. The only price observation anywhere in this report is the live listing snapshot of $20.00.
- The second ingredient database was blocked at access level on this run, returning a challenge placeholder rather than any content. Its coverage of this product is therefore undetermined - this is an access block, not evidence that the product is unindexed.
- Thirty-one of the 41 declared ingredients carry no grade at all, and no ingredient carries a grade from more than one source. Twenty-four percent grade coverage is the real ceiling of the ingredient section.
- The second community source carries zero reviews for this product, so it contributes no rating. Its price field is a relative band of four dollar signs, not an amount, and has not been converted.
- The community source's 27-row record omits fifteen ingredients that the label declares, including all six peptide and ceramide actives, and includes one ingredient the label does not declare. Benefit counts computed on that record are undercounts, and the discrepancy is disclosed rather than reconciled.
- Price is a single snapshot from 2026-11-02 against a U.S. delivery ZIP of 10001, in native USD with no conversion. Every figure describes that moment and nothing else.
- Ratings, prices and sales ranks move between captures. Every figure here describes the snapshot date at the top of the page and nothing else.
- Ingredient grades are community-database aggregates used as a reference, not a regulatory or dermatological verdict. Formulas are reformulated without notice and the carton is the authoritative text.
- No reviewer name, handle, profile link or other identifier appears anywhere in this report.