✨ Exfoliators & Peels

Paula's Choice 2% BHA Liquid Exfoliant: Formula, Tolerance and Price History

Paula's Choice · ASIN B00949CTQQ · Beauty & Personal Care › Skin Care › Face › Polishes & Scrubs › Polishes · Snapshot 2026-11-01

Paula's Choice · ASIN B00949CTQQ · Beauty & Personal Care › Skin Care › Face › Polishes & Scrubs › Polishes · Snapshot 2026-11-01

One reading of the listing, the tracked price record and two ingredient databases, assembled on 2026-11-01. Every figure below is transcribed or derived from those reads; percentages are marked as derivations.

Contents

  1. Product information
  2. Rating and buyer voice
  3. Ingredients
  4. Price
  5. Formula notes and routine fit
  6. Method, provenance and confidence

1. Product information

Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant is listed by Paula's Choice at $37.00, and it carries a 4.5 average across 117,396 ratings. The pack is 118 ml and ships from Amazon, sold by Paula's Choice Skincare.

What the listing claims

  1. GENTLE NON-ABRASIVE LEAVE-ON EXFOLIANT: With 2% BHA (Beta hydroxy acid), to unclog & diminish enlarged pores, exfoliate dead skin cells, smooth wrinkles, and brighten and even out skin tone. Combats redness, wrinkles, aging, enlarged pores, and blackheads.
  2. Dramatically improves skin's texture for radiant youthful even-toned skin. Beta hydroxy acid (BHA, also known as salicylic acid) mimics the natural exfoliation process of younger skin by helping it shed extra layers while unclogging and clearing pores.
  3. HYDRATE, BRIGHTEN & SMOOTH FINE LINES: Our unique, non-abrasive, leave-on exfoliant is gentle enough for daily use on all skin types. Exfoliates dead skin cells while clearing pores for a more even tone, plus it visibly reduces fine lines & wrinkles.
  4. Paula's Choice facial exfoliants are gentler on delicate skin of the face & neck than an abrasive face scrub, which can cause micro-tears. A BHA leave-on exfoliator delivers hydration & can exfoliate directly inside the pore & improve how the pore works.
  5. Paula's Choice Skincare makes products that work. No fragrance, no parabens, no fluff. Just effective, science-backed formulas that target any concern from wrinkles to breakouts.

Specification table

Fields exactly as printed in the listing specification block.
FieldValue
BrandPaula's Choice
Item FormDrop
Skin TypeAll
Product BenefitsNoticeably unclogs & clears pore congestion, combats blemishes, improves clarity, and smooths rough, bumpy texture. See more
Active IngredientsSalicylic Acid
Item Volume118 ml
Number of Items1
Item Weight4 ounces
Unit Count4 Fluid Ounces
Size4 Fl Oz
Product Dimensions1.57 x 1.57 x 5.51 inches; 4 ounces
Item model number22010
ManufacturerPaulas Choice
ASINB00949CTQQ
Best Sellers Rank#83 in Beauty & Personal Care; #1 in Facial Polishes
AvailabilityIn Stock
Delivery contextNew York 10001

Product images

Listing gallery, three images per row. All frames below are the seller’s own product imagery.

Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon

Further product photos

Additional frames from the same listing gallery, shown without interpretation.

Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon
Paula's Choice SKIN PERFECTING 2% BHA Liquid Leave-On Exfoliant - image
Source: Amazon

2. Rating and buyer voice

The listing shows 4.5 out of 5 from 117,396 ratings. 75% of them are five-star and 3% one-star, so the headline number rests on a top-weighted spread with a small negative tail rather than on an even split.

Rating distribution, as published.
BandShareRead
5 star75%core of the base
4 star13%supporting
3 star7%marginal
2 star2%residual
1 star3%marginal
Share of ratings by star band, in percent of all ratings. Bars follow the declared palette order.

What buyers say, in the listing’s own summary

Customers find the exfoliant effective and appreciate its ability to reduce pores and improve skin texture, making it look brighter and even-toned. The product receives mixed feedback about its moisturizing properties, with some saying it's good for dry skin while others find it too drying, and about its value for money, with some considering it worth the buy while others say it's not worth the price. Customers disagree on the fragrance, with some noting it has little to no scent while others find it unpleasant. Skin sensitivity reactions are also mixed, with some experiencing no irritation while others report burning sensations.

Aspect breakdown

Mentions counted by the listing’s review-summary widget.
AspectMentionsPositiveNegativePositive share
effectiveness61144990112482%
pore reduction3273266560881%
moisturizing1548104750168%
value for money142078563555%
skin feel105194011189%
skin appearance102991911089%
skin sensitivity91445346150%
fragrance60422537937%

The strongest theme is skin feel at 89% positive across 1051 mentions; the weakest is fragrance at 37% across 604. Anything in the mid range is a split topic rather than a complaint, and the aspect counts are mentions rather than unique buyers.

3. Ingredients

Two independent databases were merged into one index of 9 rows: 8 came from the COSDNA entry and 8 from the Skinsort entry, with duplicates folded together by ingredient name. Where the two disagree on coverage rather than on values, both readings are kept side by side in the table.

Safety profile at a glance

Rows per safety band. The band comes from the database’s own 1–9 safety score, where a lower number is the more benign reading; rows without a score are counted separately.
BandRowsShare of index
Low concern889%
Unrated111%
Ingredient count by safety band. Adjacent slices use consecutive palette entries so neighbouring bands stay distinguishable.

Comedogenic and irritant signals

0 ingredient(s) carry a published acne rating of 3 or more, 1 carry a measured 0, and 7 have no published acne value at all. 0 row(s) carry a non-zero irritant value.

Ingredients by comedogenic rating. “No published value” is an absence of data, not a zero.

Claim matrix

The consumer-verdict layer: which of the standard formulation claims the indexed formula satisfies, and which it fails.

Claim tags with the database’s own basis text.
ClaimVerdictBasis
Alcohol-freeYESdatabase tag
EU-allergen-freeYESdatabase tag
Fragrance-freeYESdatabase tag
Oil-freeYESdatabase tag
Paraben-freeYESdatabase tag
Silicone-freeYESdatabase tag
Sulfate-freeYESdatabase tag
Cruelty-freeYESdatabase tag
Pore-clogger-freeYESdatabase tag
Reef-safeYESdatabase tag
VeganYESdatabase tag
Fungal-acne-safeNOdatabase tag

11 of 12 claims read positive. A negative claim is a formulation property, not a defect: vegan and fragrance-free pull in opposite directions for a formula built on animal-derived filtrate.

Functions represented

How often each function label appears across the merged list. One ingredient can carry several labels, so the counts exceed the row total.

Merged ingredient index

Every row that either database lists, in formula order where a position is known. The COSDNA columns are its own measured ratings; the Skinsort columns are that database’s published figures where it states one.

Merged index. “—” means the database does not publish a figure for that cell.
#IngredientFunctionSafetyAcneIrritantComedogenic (other db)
1MethylpropanediolSolvent1---
2Salicylic AcidExfoliator, Whitening1---
3AquaSolvent1---
4Butylene GlycolSolvent, Fragrance, Viscosity Control, Skin conditioning, Moisturizer110-
5Polysorbate 20Surfactant, Emulsifier100-
6Camellia Oleifera Leaf ExtractSkin conditioning, Astringent1---
7Sodium HydroxidepH Adjusters1---
8Tetrasodium EDTAChelating2---
9WaterSkin Conditioning----
How the index splits between the two sources. Rows present in only one database are the ones a single-source report would have missed.

4. Price

The listing trades at $37.00. The tracked record for this ASIN starts 2013-09-14 and covers Amazon, 3rd Party New.

All-time price summary per channel, transcribed. The Current column is a last-observation value, not a live quote.
ChannelLowest everHighest everCurrentAverage
Amazon$25.08 (2021-12-18)$40.95 (2022-03-18)-$31.43
3rd Party New$16.01 (2014-09-30)$75.99 (2022-01-11)$37.00 (2026-09-08)$32.25
3rd Party Used----
Bar comparison of the four summary values per channel. A missing bar means that channel publishes no value for that metric.

Where the current price sits

Derived position metrics. Every figure here is computed from the table above, not published.
MeasureReading
Tracked band (3rd Party New)$16.01 → $75.99
Position inside the band35% of the way from the low to the high
Band width$59.98 (375% of the low)
Current vs low+131.1%
Current vs average+14.7%
Subscribe & save$33.30 (10% off the current price)
Unit price as shown$9.25 per fluid ounce

The current reading sits above the channel average, so the listing is trading rich against its own history. A channel can hold history without a current seller, which is why some rows show a range and a dash in the current column.

Volume caveat: the tracked averages weight every observation equally and cannot show how long the listing sat at any point in the band, because the record publishes five values per channel rather than a series.

5. Formula notes and routine fit

The listing’s own usage guidance, condensed without additions:

  • Paula's Choice facial exfoliants are gentler on delicate skin of the face & neck than an abrasive face scrub, which can cause micro-tears. A BHA leave-on exfoliator delivers hydration & can exfoliate directly inside the pore & improve how the pore works.
  • Paula's Choice Skincare makes products that work. No fragrance, no parabens, no fluff. Just effective, science-backed formulas that target any concern from wrinkles to breakouts.

Reading the formula as a whole: the largest functional groups are Solvent (3), Skin conditioning (2), Exfoliator (1), Whitening (1). 8 of 9 rows fall in the low-concern band and 0 sit above it. That is a texture-and-barrier formula rather than an acid- or retinoid-led one, so the risk it carries is occlusion and individual sensitivity, not predictable irritation from a strong active.

Claims the formula does not meet: Fungal-acne-safe. For anyone screening for fungal-acne triggers or vegan status, those two flags are the decisive ones; for a buyer simply looking for a fragrance-free eye product, the positive tags cover that requirement.

6. Method, provenance and confidence

Four reads feed this report: the Amazon US listing (specification block, bullets, gallery, rating histogram and review-summary widgets), a price-tracking record for the same ASIN, and two ingredient databases. The listing and the price record were read on the same day with a US delivery address, so prices are native USD and no currency conversion appears anywhere in this document.

Confidence by element.
ElementConfidenceBasis
Title, brand, specification tableHightranscribed from the listing
Rating and histogramHigh117,396 ratings, published shares rounded to whole percent
Buyer-voice aspectsMediumaggregate widget output; mentions, not unique buyers
Ingredient indexMedium to high8 rows from one database, 8 from another, merged by name
Price historyMediumall-time summary values; current readings carry their own observation dates
What this report does not claim
  • No dermatological conclusion. Ingredient ratings describe ingredients, not this finished formula on a given person.
  • No period-specific price statistic. The tracked summary is all-time and cannot be relabelled as a 30-day or 6-month figure.
  • No causality between an ingredient and a review complaint. The two are reported side by side, not linked.
  • No inference about how a price moved between two dated observations, because only the extremes and the average are published.