Shower To Shower
Beauty & Personal Care › Skin Care › Body › Cleansers › Body Washes
| Brand | Shower To Shower |
|---|---|
| Availability | In Stock |
| Sold by | Mr. Medical |
| Typical price | $18.09 |
| Stated saving | 6% |
| Subscription price | $16.24 (10% off) |
| Unit economics | $0.66 per ounce |
Product Information
| Brand | Shower To Shower |
|---|---|
| Item Form | Powder |
| Skin Type | Dry |
| Product Benefits | Soothing |
| Recommended Uses For Product | Body |
| Item Volume | 13 fluid ounces |
| Item Weight | 1.6 pounds |
| Number of Items | 2 |
| Unit Count | 26 Ounce |
| Package Size Name | Pack of 2 |
| Product Dimensions | 7.1 x 2.6 x 7.8 inches; 1.62 pounds |
| Item model number | 963 |
| UPC | 885842835382 794437504346 381370009634 789397241158 885539407212 |
| Manufacturer | Shower to Shower |
| ASIN | B0058KORME |
| Best Sellers Rank | #19,495 in Beauty & Personal Care; #361 in Bath & Shower Gels |
What the listing says about the product
- Absorbant body powder
- Soothes and refreshes
- Gives you the extra protection you need to keep you dry and confident
Product Rating
The listing carries an aggregate score of 4.8 out of 5 across 2,717 ratings. The distribution below is Amazon's own published percentage split.
How to read the distribution
The bars are the published percentage shares, rounded to whole numbers, so a small bucket reported as 1 percent is a floor rather than an exact count. The two lowest buckets together account for 2% of all ratings, which is a narrow negative tail for a personal-care listing — but with several hundred ratings behind it, that share still represents a real group of dissatisfied buyers rather than rounding noise.
Customers find the body powder effective and appreciate its silky, smooth texture that keeps them dry and comfortable throughout the day. The product has a pleasant scent and offers good value, with one customer noting it works better than high-priced perfumes. They like its after-shower use, with one mentioning it's great for post-workout freshness. The powder is perfect talc-free, though opinions about its ingredients are mixed.
Aggregated buyer-summary text published on the listing.
What buyers talk about, by theme
Each theme is Amazon's clustering of review sentences. “Positive” and “negative” are the raw sentence counts behind each cluster.
| Theme | Mentions | Positive | Negative | Positive share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| scent | 206 | 180 | 26 | |
| value for money | 82 | 71 | 11 | |
| effectiveness | 70 | 68 | 2 | |
| dryness | 50 | 49 | 1 | |
| comfort | 31 | 28 | 3 | |
| ingredients | 25 | 14 | 11 | |
| after-shave use | 24 | 23 | 1 | |
| texture | 20 | 17 | 3 |
The softest themes in the cluster set are ingredients (56% positive) and texture (85% positive). Everything else sits at two-thirds positive or better, so the dissatisfaction here is specific rather than general.
Product Ingredients
Scope of this ingredient section. the independent ingredient database was unreachable for this run (its public pages were served behind a bot-protection challenge on every attempted route); the consumer-ingredient platform that normally supplies the full INCI listing and the claim verdicts does not hold a record for this product. The analysis that follows is therefore built only from what the brand itself publishes on the retail listing. No ingredient row, safety grade, comedogenic score or claim verdict below is inferred, borrowed from a look-alike product, or reconstructed from outside knowledge — anything unavailable is stated as unavailable.
What the brand says the formula is free of
The listing copy publishes no explicit exclusion claims.
Named components in the listing copy
The listing names no individual components.
The listing publishes no full ingredient declaration in its specification table, so there is no official INCI list here to validate any third-party table against.
Composition transparency: what is accounted for and what is not
Each wedge is a category of information, not an ingredient count. The undeclared wedge is present because the brand publishes no complete formula; it is drawn at unit width so the gap is visible rather than hidden.
Why there are no risk ratings in this section
Comedogenic, irritancy and safety grades exist only where a specialist database has published them. No such database record was reachable for this product on this run, so every component above is listed without a rating. An absent rating is missing data, never a score of zero and never a statement that a component is harmless. Any skin-sensitivity decision should be taken from the brand's own label read at the point of purchase, not from this table.
Product Price
Figures below are the all-time summary recorded for this listing by a third-party price tracker, captured on 2026-10-29. Amounts are native US dollars; nothing is converted, rounded beyond two decimals, or interpolated.
| Price type | Lowest ever | Highest ever | Latest | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | $6.88 (Jun 07, 2012) | $12.24 (Nov 21, 2022) | no data | $9.23 |
| 3rd Party New | $5.00 (Dec 10, 2013) | $99.00 (Aug 31, 2018) | $17.09 (Oct 15, 2026) | $16.98 |
| 3rd Party Used | no data | no data | no data | no data |
Dates accompany the lowest, highest and latest figures because those are single observations. The average carries no date: it spans the whole tracking window (monitoring began Aug 01, 2011).
Derived readings
Every figure in this table is arithmetic performed on the transcribed values above, not a figure published by any source.
| Metric | Amazon | 3rd Party New | 3rd Party Used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread (high - low) | $5.36 | $94.00 | n/a |
| Latest vs lowest | n/a | +241.8% | n/a |
| Latest vs highest | n/a | -82.7% | n/a |
| Latest vs average | n/a | +0.6% | n/a |
| Average vs list | -45.4% | +0.4% | n/a |
Outlier flag: 3rd Party New (low $5.00, high $99.00, 19.8x apart). A tracked high that sits several multiples above the tracked low on a long-history listing is usually a reseller offer, a bundle or a mispriced sweep rather than a price the market ever generally paid. Every spread and percentage above is still computed from the published figures, but the extremes behind them should be read with that in mind.
Dated observations
The tracker publishes only its extreme and latest observations, not a day-by-day series. The lines connect those observations chronologically; the space between two points is not evidence of a smooth move from one price to the other.
The most recent observation in the set is dated Oct 15, 2026; treat the current price as a last-seen value and re-check it before acting on it.
The 3rd Party New channel last printed $17.09 on Oct 15, 2026, +0.6% against its own all-time average of $16.98 and +1.1% against the typical price of $16.91. That places it roughly 13% of the way up its own historical band.
Buyer Readout
Signals in favour
- scent — 206 mentions, 87% positive
- value for money — 82 mentions, 87% positive
- effectiveness — 70 mentions, 97% positive
- dryness — 50 mentions, 98% positive
- comfort — 31 mentions, 90% positive
Signals to weigh
- ingredients — 25 mentions, only 56% positive
Both columns are aggregates of buyer sentence clusters, not product claims. A low positive share describes how a group of buyers wrote about the product, not a measured property of the formula.
Product Gallery
Methodology and Confidence
How this report was built
| Listing capture | Read from the Amazon US product page with the delivery location set to a US ZIP so every amount is native USD. No currency conversion was applied anywhere. |
|---|---|
| Reviewer privacy | No reviewer name, handle, profile link, avatar or identifier appears anywhere in this report. Buyer feedback is reported only as published aggregates. |
| Price history | Taken from the all-time summary recorded by a third-party Amazon price tracker. Its summary block is all-time only: the chart window parameter rescales the plotted line but does not change these values, so none of them is a period statistic. |
| Ingredients | Attempted against two independent ingredient databases. One was unreachable behind a bot-protection challenge; the other holds no record for this product. The ingredient section therefore reports only brand-published composition and carries no independent risk rating. |
| Imagery | Listing images were captured alongside the page and are credited in the gallery. |
| Snapshot discipline | Every figure is a point-in-time capture. Prices, rank and review counts move between captures; this report should be re-read as dated evidence, not as a live quote. |
Confidence by element
| Element | Confidence | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Identity, pricing and availability fields | High | Read directly from the live listing |
| Aggregate rating and its distribution | High | Published on the listing; rounded percentages noted |
| Buyer-sentiment themes | Medium | Platform clustering of review sentences; no verbatim reviews were retrievable this run |
| Price extremes and averages | High | Transcribed verbatim from the tracker summary |
| Derived percentages and spreads | High arithmetic / Medium interpretation | Computed from the transcribed values, labelled as derived |
| Recency of the latest price | Medium | Last-observation value, dated in the table above |
| Composition | Medium | Brand statements only; no independent database could corroborate or rate them |
| Safety, comedogenic or irritancy scores | None available | No rating source reached this product; nothing was inferred |
Compiled as a single point-in-time capture of the United States retail listing. All amounts are US dollars. No reviewer is identified anywhere in this report.