Burt's Bees
Baby Products › Baby Care › Grooming › Skin Care › Powders
| Brand | Burt's Bees |
|---|---|
| Availability | In Stock |
| Sold by | Amazon.com |
| Typical price | $25.06 |
| Stated saving | 10% |
| Subscription price | $19.17 (24% off) |
| Unit economics | $1.00 per ounce |
Product Information
| Brand | Burt's Bees |
|---|---|
| Item Form | Powder |
| Skin Type | Sensitive |
| Product Benefits | Keeps skin soft and dry, provides relief for diaper rashes, made from natural ingredients |
| Recommended Uses For Product | Moisture Absorbtion |
| Item Volume | 227 ml |
| Item Weight | 7.5 ounces |
| Number of Items | 3 |
| Unit Count | 22.5 Ounce |
| Package Dimensions | 7.8 x 6.69 x 2.83 inches; 7.5 ounces |
| Item model number | TU_2138161 |
| Date First Available | July 24, 2023 |
| Manufacturer | Burt's Bees, Inc. |
| ASIN | B0CCPK861Q |
| Best Sellers Rank | #3,102 in Baby; #8 in Baby Powders |
What the listing says about the product
- BABY POWDER: Pamper your baby's skin from head to toe with this baby dusting powder that will help keep skin soft, dry and comfortable in between diaper changes with a mild, clean scent; package may vary
- BABY SKIN CARE: This natural baby essential provides gentle comfort and calming relief for diaper rashes and helps to absorb dampness after bath time
- 100% NATURAL ORIGIN: This 100% natural origin dusting powder is talc-free with naturally absorbent cornstarch and is formulated without parabens, phthalates, petrolatum or SLS
- PEDIATRICIAN TESTED: This hypo-allergenic dusting powder is clinically proven to be safe, effective and non-irritating to nurture baby's delicate skin
- THE PERFECT BABY GIFT: This dusting powder is a bath time essential and makes the perfect addition to any diaper bag, baby shower gift or new baby gift set
Product Rating
The listing carries an aggregate score of 4.8 out of 5 across 639 ratings. The distribution below is Amazon's own published percentage split.
How to read the distribution
The bars are the published percentage shares, rounded to whole numbers, so a small bucket reported as 1 percent is a floor rather than an exact count. The two lowest buckets together account for 3% of all ratings, which is a narrow negative tail for a personal-care listing — but with several hundred ratings behind it, that share still represents a real group of dissatisfied buyers rather than rounding noise.
Customers find this baby powder effective and appreciate its natural ingredients, sweet smell, and soft, gentle texture that feels good on the skin. The product keeps skin fresh and dry, with one customer noting it absorbs odors and sweat well. While some customers report no diaper rash issues, others experienced skin irritation. The powder receives mixed feedback regarding its absorbency and safety.
Aggregated buyer-summary text published on the listing.
What buyers talk about, by theme
Each theme is Amazon's clustering of review sentences. “Positive” and “negative” are the raw sentence counts behind each cluster.
| Theme | Mentions | Positive | Negative | Positive share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| effectiveness | 61 | 53 | 8 | |
| fragrance | 42 | 36 | 6 | |
| dryness | 26 | 24 | 2 | |
| softness | 24 | 22 | 2 | |
| skin irritation | 15 | 5 | 10 | |
| absorbency | 12 | 8 | 4 | |
| safety | 9 | 6 | 3 | |
| natural | 7 | 7 | 0 |
The softest themes in the cluster set are skin irritation (33% positive) and absorbency (67% positive). Everything else sits at two-thirds positive or better, so the dissatisfaction here is specific rather than general.
Product Ingredients
Scope of this ingredient section. the independent ingredient database was unreachable for this run (its public pages were served behind a bot-protection challenge on every attempted route); the consumer-ingredient platform that normally supplies the full INCI listing and the claim verdicts does not hold a record for this product. The analysis that follows is therefore built only from what the brand itself publishes on the retail listing. No ingredient row, safety grade, comedogenic score or claim verdict below is inferred, borrowed from a look-alike product, or reconstructed from outside knowledge — anything unavailable is stated as unavailable.
What the brand says the formula is free of
| Substance | Claim type | Verification status |
|---|---|---|
| Talc | Excluded by brand statement | Not independently verified (no database record) |
| Parabens | Excluded by brand statement | Not independently verified (no database record) |
| Phthalates | Excluded by brand statement | Not independently verified (no database record) |
| Petrolatum | Excluded by brand statement | Not independently verified (no database record) |
| SLS (Sodium Lauryl Sulfate) | Excluded by brand statement | Not independently verified (no database record) |
Named components in the listing copy
| Component | Role in the formula | Why it is there |
|---|---|---|
| Cornstarch | Absorbent base | Draws surface moisture so skin stays dry between changes |
| Fragrance (undisclosed composition) | Sensory | The listing describes a scent but does not name its components |
The listing publishes no full ingredient declaration in its specification table, so there is no official INCI list here to validate any third-party table against.
Composition transparency: what is accounted for and what is not
Each wedge is a category of information, not an ingredient count. The undeclared wedge is present because the brand publishes no complete formula; it is drawn at unit width so the gap is visible rather than hidden.
Functional profile of the named components
Why there are no risk ratings in this section
Comedogenic, irritancy and safety grades exist only where a specialist database has published them. No such database record was reachable for this product on this run, so every component above is listed without a rating. An absent rating is missing data, never a score of zero and never a statement that a component is harmless. Any skin-sensitivity decision should be taken from the brand's own label read at the point of purchase, not from this table.
Product Price
Figures below are the all-time summary recorded for this listing by a third-party price tracker, captured on 2026-10-29. Amounts are native US dollars; nothing is converted, rounded beyond two decimals, or interpolated.
| Price type | Lowest ever | Highest ever | Latest | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | $15.98 (Sep 22, 2025) | $29.97 (Jul 07, 2026) | $22.55 (Oct 20, 2026) | $23.44 |
| 3rd Party New | $20.50 (Nov 04, 2025) | $26.29 (May 16, 2025) | $22.55 (Oct 20, 2026) | $23.57 |
| 3rd Party Used | no data | no data | no data | no data |
Dates accompany the lowest, highest and latest figures because those are single observations. The average carries no date: it spans the whole tracking window (monitoring began Oct 25, 2023).
Derived readings
Every figure in this table is arithmetic performed on the transcribed values above, not a figure published by any source.
| Metric | Amazon | 3rd Party New | 3rd Party Used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread (high - low) | $13.99 | $5.79 | n/a |
| Latest vs lowest | +41.1% | +10.0% | n/a |
| Latest vs highest | -24.8% | -14.2% | n/a |
| Latest vs average | -3.8% | -4.3% | n/a |
| Average vs list | +2.3% | +2.9% | n/a |
Dated observations
The tracker publishes only its extreme and latest observations, not a day-by-day series. The lines connect those observations chronologically; the space between two points is not evidence of a smooth move from one price to the other.
The most recent observation in the set is dated Oct 20, 2026; treat the current price as a last-seen value and re-check it before acting on it.
The Amazon channel last printed $22.55 on Oct 20, 2026, -3.8% against its own all-time average of $23.44 and -1.6% against the typical price of $22.91. That places it roughly 47% of the way up its own historical band.
Buyer Readout
Signals in favour
- effectiveness — 61 mentions, 87% positive
- fragrance — 42 mentions, 86% positive
- dryness — 26 mentions, 92% positive
- softness — 24 mentions, 92% positive
- natural — 7 mentions, 100% positive
Signals to weigh
- skin irritation — 15 mentions, only 33% positive
- absorbency — 12 mentions, only 67% positive
- safety — 9 mentions, only 67% positive
Both columns are aggregates of buyer sentence clusters, not product claims. A low positive share describes how a group of buyers wrote about the product, not a measured property of the formula.
Product Gallery
Methodology and Confidence
How this report was built
| Listing capture | Read from the Amazon US product page with the delivery location set to a US ZIP so every amount is native USD. No currency conversion was applied anywhere. |
|---|---|
| Reviewer privacy | No reviewer name, handle, profile link, avatar or identifier appears anywhere in this report. Buyer feedback is reported only as published aggregates. |
| Price history | Taken from the all-time summary recorded by a third-party Amazon price tracker. Its summary block is all-time only: the chart window parameter rescales the plotted line but does not change these values, so none of them is a period statistic. |
| Ingredients | Attempted against two independent ingredient databases. One was unreachable behind a bot-protection challenge; the other holds no record for this product. The ingredient section therefore reports only brand-published composition and carries no independent risk rating. |
| Imagery | Listing images were captured alongside the page and are credited in the gallery. |
| Snapshot discipline | Every figure is a point-in-time capture. Prices, rank and review counts move between captures; this report should be re-read as dated evidence, not as a live quote. |
Confidence by element
| Element | Confidence | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Identity, pricing and availability fields | High | Read directly from the live listing |
| Aggregate rating and its distribution | High | Published on the listing; rounded percentages noted |
| Buyer-sentiment themes | Medium | Platform clustering of review sentences; no verbatim reviews were retrievable this run |
| Price extremes and averages | High | Transcribed verbatim from the tracker summary |
| Derived percentages and spreads | High arithmetic / Medium interpretation | Computed from the transcribed values, labelled as derived |
| Recency of the latest price | Medium | Last-observation value, dated in the table above |
| Composition | Medium | Brand statements only; no independent database could corroborate or rate them |
| Safety, comedogenic or irritancy scores | None available | No rating source reached this product; nothing was inferred |
Compiled as a single point-in-time capture of the United States retail listing. All amounts are US dollars. No reviewer is identified anywhere in this report.