US Beauty & Personal Care / Hair Care / Styling Products / Serums
An overnight leave-in hair serum built on plant-based proteins and niacinamide. Independent multi-source analysis of the US listing, ingredient dossiers and long-run price record.
1. Product Information
Kerastase Nutritive 8H Magic Night Serum is an overnight leave-in treatment positioned for dry hair. The formula is built around two headline actives the listing repeats throughout: plant-based proteins, described as nourishing the hair with essential nutrients while retaining moisture, and niacinamide, described as locking in hydration for long-lasting hair strength. It is the night-time step of the wider Nutritive routine, intended to sit alongside a conditioner or mask and a daytime heat protectant. Within the US catalogue it is filed under Hair Care > Styling Products > Serums, and at capture it ranked #2 in Hair Styling Serums and #1,027 in Beauty & Personal Care.
Use is deliberately low-effort and low-frequency: one to two pumps massaged into the lengths and ends of dry or damp hair before sleep, left in overnight, and not rinsed out in the morning, with the listing suggesting a three-nights-a-week cadence. The claimed mechanism is that the serum absorbs during the night rather than sitting on the surface, so it protects the hair from pillow friction, reduces frizz, detangles and adds shine by morning without transferring onto bedding.
1.1 Product Imagery
1.2 Listing Specifications
| Attribute | Value | Attribute | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product benefits | Nourishing | Hair type | All |
| Material type free | Paraben free | Scent | Floral |
| Liquid volume | 90 ml | Number of items | 1 |
| Unit count | 3.04 fluid ounces | Item volume | 3.04 fluid ounces |
| Item weight | 90 g | Product dimensions | 6.22 x 4.25 x 6.65 in; 3.17 oz |
| Brand / Manufacturer | Kerastase | Item model number | Nutritive - 8H Magic Night |
| GTIN | 03474637155025 | EAN | 347463715502 |
| Availability | In Stock | Delivery reference | New York 10001 |
| Best Sellers Rank | #1,027 in Beauty & Personal Care; #2 in Hair Styling Serums | ||
1.3 Declared Benefits and Directions
What the listing claims
- Nourishing leave-in serum that hydrates, adds deep nutrition, moisturises and detangles, leaving hair soft and shiny by morning.
- Protects from pillow friction, reduces frizz and hydrates hair in eight hours while you sleep.
- Plant-based proteins nourish with essential nutrients while retaining moisture; niacinamide locks in hydration for long-lasting strength.
- Intensely nourishes and detangles, strengthens, hydrates and enhances shine.
- Absorbs overnight without transferring onto the pillow.
- Paraben free, floral scent, suitable for all hair types prone to dryness.
Directions and routine placement
- Before sleep, apply one to two pumps and massage into lengths and ends of dry or damp hair.
- Leave in overnight. No rinse needed in the morning.
- Repeat three nights a week.
- Use with a Nutritive conditioner and/or mask plus a daytime heat protectant for best results.
- Brand FAQ: "Apply 2 to 4 pumps to mid lengths and ends, leave in overnight, do not rinse, use as often as needed."
- Instrumental claims carried in the listing imagery: 72H humidity protection, 72H long-lasting nutrition, +48% softness.
1.4 Brand Questions Answered
| Question | Brand answer |
|---|---|
| What does the 8H Magic Night Serum do? | An overnight leave-in treatment that deeply nourishes dry hair, reduces frizz and enhances shine while you sleep. |
| What are the key ingredients? | Formulated with plant-based proteins and vitamins to provide intense hydration and restore the hair fibre. |
| Will it leave residue on the pillow? | No. The lightweight formula is described as absorbing completely into the hair overnight, leaving no greasy residue on bedding. |
| Does it need to be washed out in the morning? | No. You wake up with soft, detangled, nourished hair ready to style. |
| How does it compare within the range? | Positioned against Nectar Thermique (heat protection to 450 F, conditioning, detangling), Scalp Serum (immediate scalp hydration) and Split Ends Serum (seals split ends, reduces breakage, adds shine). |
2. Product Rating and Buyer Sentiment
2.1 Rating Distribution
2.2 Aspect Sentiment
Eight aspects carry sentiment counts. Each bar shows the positive share of mentions; the count behind each aspect is printed at the right.
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Negative | Positive share | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness | 545 | 433 | 112 | 79% | Strongly positive |
| Fragrance | 261 | 200 | 61 | 77% | Strongly positive |
| Value for money | 254 | 111 | 143 | 44% | Split - the one weak spot |
| Softness | 244 | 232 | 12 | 95% | Near-unanimous |
| Frizz control | 227 | 181 | 46 | 80% | Strongly positive |
| Shine | 109 | 105 | 4 | 96% | Near-unanimous |
| Non-greasy | 96 | 88 | 8 | 92% | Near-unanimous |
| Lightweight | 48 | 45 | 3 | 94% | Near-unanimous |
2.3 What Buyers Say
"Customers find this hair serum effective, noting that a little goes a long way and it smells fabulous. The product receives positive feedback for its softness, making hair feel like silk, and its ability to reduce frizz and moisturise bleached ends. They appreciate its shine-enhancing properties, with hair looking fresh and styled, and its non-greasy formula that doesn't weigh it down. While many customers consider it worth the price, some find it overpriced."
Aggregate summary published on the listing. No individual reviewer is named, quoted by handle, or linked.
Recurring positives and complaints
Recurring positives
- Effectiveness - 433 of 545 mentions positive. "A little goes a long way" is the recurring phrasing.
- Softness - 232 of 244 positive (95%); the "hair feels like silk" theme.
- Shine - 105 of 109 positive (96%), the highest-scoring aspect.
- Non-greasy and lightweight - 92% and 94% positive; "doesn't weigh it down".
- Frizz control - 181 of 227 positive (80%).
- Fragrance - 200 of 261 positive (77%); "smells fabulous".
Recurring complaints
- Price - the only complaint with real volume. Value for money is the sole aspect below 50% positive, at 44% (111 positive against 143 negative across 254 mentions).
- No other aspect falls below 77% positive, so value is a single isolated objection rather than part of a broader quality problem.
3. Ingredient Analysis
Two independent ingredient dossiers were captured and merged for this section: an ingredient database carrying 27 rated entries, and a claim-and-benefit database carrying 29 entries including the two colorants. Merging them yields a 29-ingredient list in INCI order, with function from the claim database and safety, comedogenic and irritancy ratings from the ingredient database. Twenty-seven of the 29 entries carry a safety rating; the two colorants do not.
3.1 What's Inside - Claim Matrix
Twelve claims were tested. Six pass and six fail. Read the polarity carefully: a claim marked means the product is not that thing.
3.2 Ingredients List - 29 Entries in INCI Order
Level is derived from the safety rating's upper bound: 1 is the safest figure and a higher value calls for more caution. Comedogenic and irritancy run the other way, where 0 is safest. A dash means not rated - which is missing data, not a clean bill of health.
| # | Ingredient | Function | Comedogenic | Irritancy | Safety | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water | Skin conditioning | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 2 | Dimethicone | Emollient | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | Level 5 |
| 3 | C13-16 Isoparaffin | Solvent | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 4 | Niacinamide | Smoothing | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 5 | Glycerin | Humectant | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | Level 2 |
| 6 | Polyacrylamide | Viscosity control, antistatic | - | - | 2-6 | Level 6 |
| 7 | Phenoxyethanol | Preservative | - | - | 2-4 | Level 4 |
| 8 | C13-14 Isoparaffin | Emollient | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 9 | Laureth-7 | Emulsifying | - | - | 1-2 | Level 2 |
| 10 | Panthenol | Skin conditioning | 0 | 0 | 1 | Level 1 |
| 11 | Ascorbyl Glucoside | Antioxidant | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 12 | Butylene Glycol | Humectant | 1 | 0 | 1 | Level 1 |
| 13 | Linalool | Perfuming | - | - | 3-4 | Level 4 |
| 14 | Hydroxycitronellal | Perfuming | - | - | 3 | Level 3 |
| 15 | Benzyl Salicylate | Perfuming | - | - | 3-4 | Level 4 |
| 16 | Benzyl Alcohol | Perfuming, preservative, solvent | - | - | 4 | Level 4 |
| 17 | Hexyl Cinnamal | Perfuming | - | - | 4 | Level 4 |
| 18 | Citronellol | Perfuming | - | - | 3-4 | Level 4 |
| 19 | Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein | Skin conditioning, antistatic | - | - | 1-4 | Level 4 |
| 20 | Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone | Perfuming | - | - | 3 | Level 3 |
| 21 | Coumarin | Perfuming | - | - | 4 | Level 4 |
| 22 | Hydrolyzed Corn Protein | Skin conditioning, antistatic | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 23 | Hydrolyzed Soy Protein | Humectant, antistatic | - | - | Not rated | Not rated |
| 24 | Limonene | Perfuming | - | - | 3 | Level 3 |
| 25 | Iris Florentina Root Extract | Masking | - | - | 1 | Level 1 |
| 26 | Citric Acid | Buffering | - | - | 1-2 | Level 2 |
| 27 | CI 19140 / Yellow 5 | Cosmetic colorant | - | - | Not rated | Not rated |
| 28 | CI 14700 / Red 4 | Cosmetic colorant | 2 | 1 | Not rated | Not rated |
| 29 | Parfum / Fragrance | Masking | - | - | 4 | Level 4 |
3.3 Ingredient Count by Safety Level
| Level | Meaning | Count | Share | Representative ingredients |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Lowest concern band | 9 | 31.0% | Water, Niacinamide, Glycerin-free base; Panthenol, Ascorbyl Glucoside, Butylene Glycol |
| Level 2 | Low concern | 3 | 10.3% | Glycerin, Laureth-7, Citric Acid |
| Level 3 | Moderate caution | 3 | 10.3% | Hydroxycitronellal, Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone, Limonene |
| Level 4 | Elevated caution | 9 | 31.0% | Parfum, Benzyl Alcohol, Hexyl Cinnamal, Citronellol, Linalool, Coumarin |
| Level 5 | Higher caution | 1 | 3.4% | Dimethicone (2-5) |
| Level 6 | Highest band in this list | 1 | 3.4% | Polyacrylamide (2-6) |
| Not rated | No data | 3 | 10.3% | Hydrolyzed Soy Protein, CI 19140, CI 14700 |
3.4 Functional Composition
| Functional group | Ingredients | Count | Role in the formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perfuming and masking | Linalool, Hydroxycitronellal, Benzyl Salicylate, Benzyl Alcohol, Hexyl Cinnamal, Citronellol, Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone, Coumarin, Limonene, Parfum, Iris Florentina Root Extract | 11 | The signature Nutritive floral scent and its declarable allergens |
| Skin conditioning and proteins | Water, Panthenol, Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein, Hydrolyzed Corn Protein | 4 | Conditioning base and the marketed plant-protein payload |
| Humectants | Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, Hydrolyzed Soy Protein | 3 | Water binding and hydration performance |
| Emollients and solvents | Dimethicone, C13-16 Isoparaffin, C13-14 Isoparaffin, Benzyl Alcohol | 4 | Smoothing film plus the volatile carrier that keeps it light |
| Emulsifying and texture | Laureth-7, Polyacrylamide | 2 | The gel network that suspends the silicone phase |
| Preservative, pH and antioxidant | Phenoxyethanol, Citric Acid, Ascorbyl Glucoside | 3 | Shelf stability, pH adjustment, antioxidant support |
| Actives and colorants | Niacinamide, CI 19140, CI 14700 | 3 | The headline vitamin B3 derivative and the two dyes |
3.5 Flagged Ingredients
All ten flagged entries are fragrance materials. The single highest safety figure in the list is 4, and it is reached only inside the fragrance block.
Level 4 - elevated caution
| Ingredient | Safety | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Parfum / Fragrance | 4 | Masking |
| Benzyl Alcohol | 4 | Perfuming, preservative, solvent |
| Hexyl Cinnamal | 4 | Perfuming |
| Coumarin | 4 | Perfuming |
| Linalool | 3-4 | Perfuming |
| Benzyl Salicylate | 3-4 | Perfuming, UV absorber |
| Citronellol | 3-4 | Perfuming |
| Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein | 1-4 | Conditioning, antistatic |
| Phenoxyethanol | 2-4 | Preservative |
Level 3 - moderate caution
| Ingredient | Safety | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxycitronellal | 3 | Perfuming |
| Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone | 3 | Perfuming |
| Limonene | 3 | Perfuming, solvent |
Declared EU fragrance allergens
Nine of them: Linalool, Hydroxycitronellal, Benzyl Salicylate, Benzyl Alcohol, Hexyl Cinnamal, Citronellol, Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone, Coumarin and Limonene. Three - Linalool, Citronellol and Limonene - are also recognised essential-oil allergens. Their separate declaration means the listing is properly labelled, not that the fragrance load is low.
3.6 Benefit and Concern Signals
Benefits by supporting ingredient count
Community sentiment on the ingredient list
Class-level concerns flagged
| Concern | Description |
|---|---|
| May worsen irritation | May cause stinging, redness, or sensitivity. |
| May worsen eczema | May worsen itching or irritation for eczema. |
| May worsen rosacea | Can trigger flare-ups in rosacea-prone skin. |
| May worsen oily skin | May increase shine or excess oil. |
These are ingredient-class warnings - "this formula contains ingredients capable of ..." - not a verdict on the product or on any individual. Every one of them traces back to the fragrance system or to the silicone and humectant load.
Key ingredient groups recognised
| Group | Mechanism | Ingredients |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | Brightens, evens tone, supports collagen | 1 |
| Niacinamide | Strengthens, smooths, brightens | 1 |
| Antioxidants | Shields from free radical damage | 1 |
The Vitamin C and antioxidant groups both resolve to the same single entry, Ascorbyl Glucoside at position 11. The database does not separately recognise the hydrolysed wheat, corn and soy protein trio that the brand markets as its plant-based protein complex, because protein conditioning is not a category this skin-oriented database scores.
3.7 Formula Logic
| Group | Ingredients | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Solvent base | Water; C13-16 Isoparaffin; C13-14 Isoparaffin; Butylene Glycol | Carries the formula and sets initial slip and spread |
| Conditioning film | Dimethicone; Polyacrylamide; Laureth-7 | Dimethicone forms the smoothing, frizz-reducing film; the polyacrylamide / laureth-7 pair is the classic emulsified gel network that suspends and stabilises it |
| Humectants and actives | Glycerin; Niacinamide; Panthenol; Ascorbyl Glucoside; hydrolysed wheat, corn and soy proteins | Water binding, barrier support and the marketed protein payload |
| Preservation and pH | Phenoxyethanol; Benzyl Alcohol; Citric Acid | Preservation and pH adjustment |
| Fragrance system | Nine declared allergens plus Parfum | The signature Nutritive scent |
The official brand ingredient list publishes the same 29 entries in the same order as the merged list above, so there is no formula-version gap: this is a single, current formulation. Extract content is minimal - Iris Florentina Root Extract at position 25 is the only botanical extract in the formula.
4. Price Analysis
The US listing was captured with a New York delivery reference (ZIP 10001) and priced natively in USD - no conversion, no estimation. All long-run figures below come from a third-party Amazon price tracker that has monitored this product since 14 November 2023, roughly three years of history.
4.1 Live Listing Snapshot
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Current price | $64.00 | Buy box with a New York 10001 delivery reference |
| List price | Not shown on the listing | The tracker records a $62.00 list price for the product |
| Subscribe & Save | $60.80 | 5% below the one-off price |
| Discount or coupon | None active | No percentage-off or coupon was rendered at capture |
| Unit price | $21.05 per fluid ounce | Amazon derives this from a unit count that is often hard-coded; the real figure for a 3.04 fl oz bottle is about $21.05, so the two agree here |
| Availability | In Stock | Free delivery quoted for Thursday, 5 November; same-day for Prime |
| Sold by | Kerastase | Brand-operated offer |
4.2 Long-Run Price Record
| Price type | Lowest ever | Highest ever | Current | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon (sold and shipped by Amazon) | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| 3rd party new | $49.60 (23 Jun 2026) | $64.00 (1 Sep 2026) | $64.00 (1 Sep 2026) | $58.52 |
| 3rd party used | No data | No data | No data | No data |
4.3 Price Level Comparison
Bar comparison of every price in the long-run record plus the list price. The current price sits level with the all-time high.
4.4 Position Against Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Value | Current vs benchmark | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest ever | $49.60 | +29.0% | Well above the floor |
| Highest ever | $64.00 | 0.0% | Exactly at the ceiling |
| Tracked average | $58.52 | +9.4% | Moderately above the long-run mean |
| List price | $62.00 | +3.2% | Small premium to list |
4.5 Volatility and Timeline
Volatility measures
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Spread (high - low) | $14.40 |
| Spread as a share of the low | 29.0% |
| Dated extremes recorded | 2 (one low, one high) |
| Tracked average vs list price | -5.6% |
| Monitoring window | 14 Nov 2023 to 1 Nov 2026 |
A 29% spread over roughly three years is moderate for a prestige hair-care item, but the shape matters more than the width: only two dated extremes exist, and the ceiling is the current value. There is no recorded excursion above $64.00 and no return to the floor once the ceiling was set.
Timeline of dated extremes
| Date | Event | Price |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2023 | Monitoring begins | Not recorded |
| 23 Jun 2026 | Lowest ever observed | $49.60 |
| 1 Sep 2026 | Highest ever observed - and the current value | $64.00 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | This capture | $64.00 (last observation, 61 days old) |
The low and the high are about 70 days apart and both fall in 2026; nothing in the earlier two-plus years produced a dated extreme. The price movement on this item is concentrated in the recent window rather than spread across its history - though the record does not expose enough observations to say more than that.
5. Positioning and Who It Suits
The case for it
- Category standing. #2 in Hair Styling Serums and #1,027 in Beauty & Personal Care at capture - a genuine top-of-category position, not a niche listing.
- Sentiment depth. 11,394 ratings at 4.6, with 89% at four stars or better and near-unanimous scores on softness (95%), shine (96%), non-greasy feel (92%) and lightweight feel (94%).
- Coherent formula. The three marketed actives - niacinamide, the hydrolysed wheat/corn/soy protein trio, and glycerin - are all present, and the silicone-plus-volatile-solvent system explains the "doesn't weigh it down" feedback mechanically.
- Claim compliance. Six of twelve tested claims pass, including paraben-free, sulfate-free, fungal-acne-safe and pore-clogger-free.
- Brand-operated offer. Sold by Kerastase itself.
The case against it
- Fragrance load. 11 of 29 entries are perfume or masking materials, including nine declarable EU allergens. All ten flagged ingredients are fragrance-related.
- Price objection. Value for money is the only aspect below 50% positive (44%), and the item is currently at its all-time high - 9.4% above the tracked average and 29.0% above the observed floor.
- Not a clean-label product. Not fragrance-free, not silicone-free, not alcohol-free, not vegan, not cruelty-free.
- Synthetic colorants. CI 19140 and CI 14700 are present and unrated in the ingredient database.
- Class-level warnings. Four concern flags, all traceable to the fragrance system or the silicone and humectant load.
Suitability guidance
| Audience | Verdict | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Dry to very dry hair wanting overnight conditioning, frizz reduction and shine | Good fit | Formulation intent matches; frizz control 80% and softness 95% positive |
| Buyers who enjoy a floral, salon-style fragrance | Good fit | Fragrance aspect 77% positive; scent is a marketed feature |
| Fragrance-sensitive or essential-oil-reactive users | Avoid | Nine declarable allergens including linalool, citronellol and limonene; overnight contact extends exposure |
| Contact dermatitis history on scalp or hairline | Caution | Four class-level concern flags, all fragrance or silicone driven |
| Silicone-free or fragrance-free seekers | Not suitable | Dimethicone at position 2; Parfum declared at position 29 |
| Vegan or cruelty-free requirement | Not suitable | Both claims flagged as failing |
| Value-driven buyers | Consider timing | Current price is the all-time high; the tracked average is $58.52 |
6. Method, Confidence and Limitations
6.1 Confidence by Element
| Element | Confidence | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Title, brand, specifications, availability, sold-by | High | Read directly from the live US listing with a US delivery reference |
| Price, Subscribe & Save, unit price | High | Native USD from the live listing, no conversion |
| Rating, rating count, distribution | High | Published on the listing; buckets are rounded percentages |
| Aspect sentiment counts | High | Published aggregate, but not attributable to readable individual reviews |
| Merged ingredient list (29 entries) | High | Two independent dossiers agree name-for-name and order-for-order, and both match the official brand list |
| Claim matrix (12 badges) | High | Complete badge block captured; polarity read from the printed prefix |
| Safety, comedogenic and irritancy ratings | Medium | Community-aggregated reference data; most rows carry no comedogenic or irritancy value at all |
| Long-run price low / high / average | High | Verbatim from the tracking record |
| Current tracked price as a live quote | Low | 61 days stale at capture; corroborated but not replaced by the live listing read |
| Individual buyer reviews | Not available | Zero inline reviews rendered on any page variant in this run |
| Buyer photos | Not available | The listing exposed no customer image tiles |
| Period-specific price statistics | Not available | The tracking record exposes all-time summary values only |
6.2 Limitations
- Snapshot, not a series. Every figure is a capture taken on 1 November 2026. Rank, price and rating counts move between captures.
- No individual review text. The desktop listing, the mobile listing and the review-endpoint fallbacks all returned zero inline reviews, so Section 2 rests on published aggregates and aspect counts rather than on verbatim buyer quotes. No reviewer is named, handled or linked anywhere in this report.
- No buyer photography. The listing exposed no customer image tiles. All imagery shown is listing-supplied and labelled as such.
- All-time price only. The tracking record's summary block is identical at every chart window, so no 1-month, 3-month, 6-month or 1-year low, high or average can be produced. Nothing in Section 4 is a period statistic.
- No observation-level price history. The record holds five values per price type, not a row-per-change table, so nothing can be said about how many times the price moved or how long it spent at any level.
- Single tracked channel. Only third-party new carries data, so no first-party versus marketplace comparison, no marketplace premium and no parity assessment is possible.
- Reference data, not regulation. Ingredient ratings come from community databases. They are reference material, not a compliance determination and not a substitute for a patch test.
- Unrated is not safe. A dash in any ingredient column means no data. Twenty-five of 29 entries carry no comedogenic value and 25 carry no irritancy value.
- Skin vocabulary on a hair product. Benefit and concern labels are generated by a skincare database. They describe ingredient classes, not product performance on hair.
- Regional formula caveat. The official ingredient list used for cross-checking is the brand's regional site listing; the US listing does not publish a full INCI. Regional formulas can differ.
Analysis compiled 1 November 2026. Pricing is native USD captured against a New York (10001) delivery reference. Rank and price are live values and will move. Ingredient ratings are aggregated reference data and are not a regulatory or clinical determination.