What the listing actually declares
Specification sheet, headline claims and photography, read once from the Amazon US detail page on 2026-11-01 with a US delivery address active. Nothing in this dossier is converted from another currency or inferred from a sibling product.
Specification sheet
| Field | Published value |
|---|---|
| Item Form | Cream, Spray |
| Scent | Unscented |
| Brand | Dr.Althea |
| Product Benefits | Moisturizing |
| Skin Type | All |
| Brand Name | Dr.Althea |
| Set Name | 345 Relief |
| Item Highlight | Soothing Recovery & Moisture for Sensitive Skin, Daily Post-Acne Moisturizer, Versatile Hydration Mist Spray |
| Unit Count | 1 Count |
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Manufacturer | Kolmar & Cosmax |
| Best Sellers Rank | #5,551 in Beauty & Personal Care; #9 in Skin Care Sets & Kits |
| ASIN | B0G4W2FT6S |
| Product Dimensions | 2.95 x 1.57 x 6.1 inches; 8.15 ounces |
Headline claims
- 345 RELIEF CREAM (50ml): A soothing daily moisturizer that calms blemishes and irritated skin. Formulated with Niacinamide and Ceramide NP, it helps reduce redness, strengthen the skin barrier, and deliver lasting hydration.
- 345 RELIEF CREAM MIST (100ml): Ultra-fine mist instantly replenishes dry skin with deep moisture, helping to support long-lasting hydration with comfort throughout the day.
- WHY CHOOSE DR.ALTHEA : We are rooted in a strong commitment to clean, natural products to consistently focused on minimalist formulations inspired by nature in order to carefully develop effective yet gentle skincare that addresses sensitive skin concerns and supports long-term skin health.
Product images
Three frames per row, in the order the listing publishes them.
Real product photos
The listing rendered no buyer-upload tiles at capture time, so this strip carries the remaining Amazon listing photography rather than customer uploads.
The score, its distribution, and the themes under it
Aggregate ratings come straight from the platform. Review substance is summarised by aspect rather than quoted: no reviewer name, handle, avatar, identifier or profile link appears anywhere in this dossier.
Distribution of ratings
86% of the 658 ratings sit at five stars and 9% at four, so 95% of the record is positive. The tail is thin but not absent: 3% lands at one or two stars, which for a barrier cream is the share of buyers whose skin did not tolerate it.
What buyers write about
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Negative | Positive share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness | 61 | 56 | 5 | 92% |
| Moisturizing | 44 | 36 | 8 | 82% |
| Texture | 23 | 18 | 5 | 78% |
| Value For Money | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92% |
| Mist Quality | 12 | 8 | 4 | 67% |
| Skin Appearance | 9 | 6 | 3 | 67% |
| Skin Irritation | 9 | 6 | 3 | 67% |
| Lightweight | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75% |
Aspect counts are a model-generated summary of the review corpus, not a vote tally, and do not sum to the rating total.
The platform's own summary
Customers find the skin care set effective, with one noting it's better than prescription products, and they appreciate how it leaves their face feeling hydrated and soft. The product receives positive feedback for its lightweight texture and value for money. The mist quality and skin appearance receive mixed reviews - while some love the mist, others are less impressed, and while many find their skin looks glowy, some report redness. Customers report mixed experiences with skin irritation, with some finding it soothing while others say it irritated their skin.
Reading the signal
The strongest theme is effectiveness (92% positive across 61 mentions) and the weakest is mist quality (67% of 12). A 4.7 average with a 3% one-star tail is the profile of a product that works for most buyers and irritates a small, identifiable minority — the pattern to check against your own skin before committing to the set.
Confidence: high for the score, the count and the histogram (published directly); medium for the aspect split, which is a summary layer over the review corpus rather than a count of votes.
Two databases, one formula, and where they disagree
COSDNA supplies acne risk, irritant and safety grades; Skinsort supplies INCI position, function and comedogenic / irritancy ratings plus the consumer claim matrix. Rows were normalised and fused on ingredient name: 38 matched exactly, 0 sit only in COSDNA, 0 only in Skinsort.
Level classification
Every ingredient carrying a COSDNA safety grade is bucketed by it. The scale runs the other way round from a conventional score: 1 is the least concerning reading and higher numbers mean more caution is warranted. The two left-hand bands are therefore the clean ones. Not rated means the database holds no entry — it is missing data, not a clean bill.
| Safety band | Ingredients | Share of table |
|---|---|---|
| Band 1 — least concerning | 28 | 73.7% |
| Band 2 — low | 9 | 23.7% |
| Band 3 — moderate | 1 | 2.6% |
| Band 4 — elevated | 0 | 0.0% |
| Not rated | 0 | 0.0% |
Functional architecture
Read the profile as a formula shape rather than a list. This one is built as a light oil-in-water emulsion: a tea-tree leaf-water and solvent base, a modest silicone and ester load for slip, glycerin and two hyaluronic weights for water binding, a single niacinamide line for tone, and a barrier tail of ceramide NP, panthenol, madecassoside and beta-glucan. The plant-extract block sits late in the INCI order, which is where a soothing story belongs.
Ingredients that carry a flag
A row appears here when at least one published grade reaches 3. Read it as a class-level signal about an ingredient, not a prediction about this jar for your skin.
| Ingredient | Function | Acne | Irritant | Safety | Comedo. | Irritancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tromethamine | pH Adjusters | – | – | 1-3 | – | – |
| Tocopherol | Antioxidant | 2-3 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
What's inside: the claim matrix
Labels are printed as the aggregator grades them. A cross is a failing claim, not a neutral reading — for a cream marketed to reactive skin, the fragrance line is the one worth reading twice.
Flagged concerns
Skinsort publishes no Concerns block for this formula. That is an absence of a flag, not a finding of safety — the rated ingredient rows below are where the actual evidence sits.
Key ingredient groups
Claims the formula can support
Bar length is the number of ingredients the aggregator credits for each benefit. A one-ingredient claim is a weak signal, not a promise.
Complete ingredient table
38 rows in published order. Acne, irritant and safety come from COSDNA; comedogenic and irritancy from Skinsort. A dash means the database holds no rating.
| # | Ingredient (INCI) | Function | Acne | Irritant | Safety | Comedo. | Irritancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Aqua | Solvent | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 02 | Melaleuca Alternifolia Leaf Water | Astringent | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 03 | Propanediol | Solvent, Viscosity Control | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 04 | Glycerin | Solvent, Viscosity Control, Skin conditioning, Moisturizer | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 |
| 05 | 1,2-Hexanediol | Solvent | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 06 | Hydrogenated Polydecene | Solvent, Fragrance, Skin conditioning, Emollient | – | – | 2 | – | – |
| 07 | Vinyldimethicone | Viscosity Control | – | – | 1-2 | – | – |
| 08 | C14-22 Alcohols | Emulsion Stabilising | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 09 | Niacinamide | Skin conditioning | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 10 | Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride | Fragrance, Skin conditioning | 1 | – | 1 | – | – |
| 11 | Panthenol | Antistatic, Skin conditioning, Moisturizer, Anti-inflammatory | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | Dicaprylyl Carbonate | Emollient | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 13 | Butylene Glycol | Solvent, Fragrance, Viscosity Control, Skin conditioning, Moisturizer | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 14 | Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer | Surfactant, Viscosity Control | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 15 | Caprylyl Methicone | Skin conditioning | – | – | 1-2 | – | – |
| 16 | Polymethylsilsesquioxane | – | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 17 | C12-20 Alkyl Glucoside | Emulsifier | – | – | 1-2 | – | – |
| 18 | Hydroxyacetophenone | Antioxidant | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 19 | Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer | Viscosity Control | – | – | 1-2 | – | – |
| 20 | Polyquaternium-51 | Moisturizer | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 21 | Ethylhexylglycerin | Skin Conditioning | – | – | 2 | – | – |
| 22 | Tromethamine | pH Adjusters | – | – | 1-3 | – | – |
| 23 | Sodium Hyaluronate | Skin conditioning, Moisturizer | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | Sodium Stearoyl Glutamate | Emulsifier | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 25 | Coptis Japonica Root Extract | Skin conditioning | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 26 | Centella Asiatica Leaf Water | Skin conditioning | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 27 | Beta-Glucan | Anti-allergic | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 28 | Resveratrol | Antioxidant | – | – | 2 | – | – |
| 29 | Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid | Skin conditioning, Moisturizer | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 30 | Camellia Sinensis Leaf Water | Fragrance | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 31 | Tocopherol | Antioxidant | 2-3 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| 32 | Madecassoside | Skin conditioning, Antioxidant, Plant extract | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 33 | Sodium DNA | Skin conditioning | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 34 | Centella Asiatica Extract | Skin conditioning, Anti-inflammatory | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 35 | Ceramide NP | Moisturizer | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 36 | Tannic Acid | Pigment, Viscosity Control, Astringent, Emulsifier | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| 37 | Disodium EDTA | Viscosity Control | – | – | 2 | – | – |
| 38 | Sodium Phytate | Chelating | – | – | 1 | – | – |
Reading notes. Acne risk and irritancy are read low-is-safer; safety is an inverse grade where 1 is the least concerning. Where a source prints a range, the upper bound is used for banding so an ingredient is never quietly upgraded. One row (Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride) printed two of the three grades; the printed values were assigned to acne risk and safety, leaving irritant unrated, so that single cell is alignment-inferred rather than published. Every other row carried either one value (safety) or three values in full column order.
Where the ask sits inside its own record
The current ask, the surrounding history, and how the price behaves against its floor, its average and the list price. Every figure is USD as rendered for a US delivery address; nothing is converted and nothing is estimated.
Price history by channel
| Price type | Lowest ever | Low date | Highest ever | High date | Current | Current date | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3rd Party New | $28.00 | 2026-10-07 | $46.90 | 2026-10-27 | $46.90 | 2026-10-27 | $36.85 |
| 3rd Party Used | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
The tracker's summary block is all-time by construction: changing the chart window rescales the line but never re-computes these values, so no period-specific low or high can be read from it. The last observation in the record is dated 2026-10-27, 5 days before this capture, and the tracker reports its last scan as “4 days ago”. Treat the live figure as up to 5 days old, not as a quote for today.
Channel comparison
Four bars per channel — the floor, the average, the live ask and the ceiling. A channel with no data is drawn as no bars at all rather than as a zero.
Dated observations
The tracker publishes the dated extremes and the last observation, not a full series, so the line below connects the actual dated points rather than inventing the days in between.
Derived position
| Metric | Value | Percent | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-time range, 3rd Party New | $18.90 | 67.5% | Highest ever minus lowest ever, as a share of the floor |
| Current vs all-time low (3rd Party New) | +67.5% | — | How far the live price sits above the floor |
| Current vs all-time average (3rd Party New) | +27.3% | — | Above average puts the price in the upper half of its own history |
| Current vs list price | — | — | List price is the brand's reference, not a promotional anchor |
What the record says
Amazon never held the buy box for this listing inside the tracking window — the Amazon row is empty across all four values — so the reference series here is 3rd Party New. Its live value of $46.90 sits +27.3% against an all-time average of $36.85 and +67.5% above the floor of $28.00. The full record spans $18.90, or 67.5% of the floor, which is the pricing latitude a marketplace-only listing actually has.
Every observation in the record belongs to third-party sellers, so the spread is a supply signal rather than a brand-pricing signal: the ceiling of $46.90 was set by whoever was fulfilling at the time. The pair of dates matters more than the pair of numbers — the floor was set on 2026-10-07 and the ceiling on 2026-10-27, with the price finishing the window at the top.
Confidence: high for the transcribed prices and dates, medium for the interpretive paragraphs, which reason from five values per channel rather than from an observation log.
Scope, limits and confidence
One marketplace (Amazon US), one SKU, one capture per source on 2026-11-01. Prices read with a US delivery address active and quoted in native USD. Ratings are the platform's own aggregate, not a re-scored sample.
38 COSDNA rows and 38 Skinsort rows were normalised and joined on ingredient name: 38 matched, 0 COSDNA-only, 0 Skinsort-only. Position order follows Skinsort where it exists.
Both ingredient sources are community databases, not regulatory filings; their grades are class-level references. The price record holds five values per channel, so period-specific extremes cannot be derived from it. The set contains two SKUs and the ingredient table covers the cream; the mist is a separate formula.
No reviewer name, handle, avatar, identifier or profile link is reproduced. Review content appears only as aggregated aspects and the platform's own summary paragraph.