Medicine Mama VMAGIC: Ingredients, Ratings and Price Analysis

1. 01Product information
2. 02Rating & customer voice
3. 03Ingredients
4. 04Price & history
5. 05Gallery
6. 06Data notes

01Product information

VMAGIC is Medicine Mama's entry in the vaginal-moisturizer leaf of Amazon's feminine-care tree, where it currently holds the number two position. The format is a 2 fl oz (56 g) balm in a frosted glass jar, and the listing describes it as an organic, hormone-free formulation built on olive, avocado and sea-buckthorn oils, beeswax and a proprietary honey and propolis blend. It is presented for external use on vulvar skin rather than as an internal product, and the label's own wording is barrier language: hydrate, soothe, protect, calm.

That ingredient list is unusually short for the category, which makes the analysis unusually direct. There are five declared lines and five graded rows, three of which carry a published comedogenic and irritancy pair and two of which carry nothing. The oil-and-wax base is what produces both the product's best scores and its worst ones: the same three oils that make it an effective occlusive are the three the grading library lists as potential pore cloggers and potential fungal-acne triggers. Nothing in this dossier resolves that tension, because it is not a defect in the data - it is the product.

What the listing promises

Specification sheet

02Rating and customer voice

Two things are worth separating here: the shape of the star distribution, and the words buyers use when they explain it. The first is arithmetic, the second is evidence. Neither is extrapolated past what the listing published.

What buyers say, in aggregate

Aspect-level sentiment

A high positive share on a small mention count is weaker evidence than a middling share on a large one. Read the two columns together.

Customer voice

Verbatim review text did not render on the captured listing page, so none is quoted. The aggregate summary and the aspect table above are the published substitutes; no review language has been written on the product's behalf.

03Ingredients

5 ingredients were merged into a single roster and graded on three axes: comedogenic risk, irritation risk and an overall safety grade. On all three, low is safer. The level assigned to an ingredient is the highest of its three grades, so one severe flag is never averaged away by two benign ones.

What's inside

A "not" prefix is a failed claim, not a marketing variant: the formula does not meet that standard.

Level classification

"Not graded" means missing data, not a clean record. Commodity ingredients and botanical blends routinely carry no grade in either database.

Ingredients that carry a flag

Benefit claims and the size of the supporting cast

Class-level concerns

These are class-level warnings: the formula contains ingredients capable of the stated effect. They are not a prediction about any individual user.

Key ingredient groups

• Triglycerides — 3 ingredient(s). Plant and animal oil compounds that the Malassezia yeast behind fungal acne can break down into fatty acids. This group is why the formula fails the fungal-acne-safe claim.
• Esters — 1 ingredient(s). Fatty acids attached to alcohols. Malassezia can separate them for food. Beeswax is the ester here, listed as an unlikely trigger rather than a potential one.
• Oils and waxes — 4 ingredient(s). Olive, avocado and sea-buckthorn oils plus beeswax form the entire non-honey base, which is what makes the balm an occlusive barrier rather than a water-based moisturizer.

Ingredient declaration

Complete graded roster

04Price and history

Every figure is native USD against a U.S. delivery address. No currency conversion and no estimated value has been inserted. The history block covers the full monitoring record rather than a rolling window.

Price history

"Current" here is the last observed value with its own date stamp, not a live quote. Monitoring began October 17, 2012.

The four reference prices, compared

Where the current price sits inside the historical band

Each bar spans the all-time low to the all-time high for that channel; the marker is the current observation and the notch is the average.

Position and spread

05Product gallery

Listing imagery reproduced in the order it appears on the product page, three to a row.

06Data notes

• Review text did not render on the captured listing page. The rating, the star distribution and the aspect table are published aggregates and are reported in full; no review body has been written on the product's behalf or paraphrased to fill the gap.
• No buyer-uploaded photographs were rendered for this listing. The count is an observed zero rather than a parse failure, and no listing imagery has been substituted for customer content.
• The independent ingredient database that this dossier would normally cite returned a bot-check interstitial on the single permitted attempt, so it contributed no grades. Every grade in the ingredient section comes from the grading library named in the collection record, not from the blocked source.
• Two of five ingredients carry no comedogenic or irritancy value at all, and the three that do carry ranges rather than point values. Nothing has been inferred from chemistry or carried over from a similar oil.
• Propolis is named on the label inside a proprietary blend but is itemised nowhere in the graded roster, so it remains ungraded. The same applies to every other component of that blend.
• The list price of $29.99 comes from the price tracker rather than the live listing, which renders no struck-through or typical price. It is used only as the anchor for the discount calculation.
• The third-party channel's all-time high of $999.00 is a marketplace artefact, not a transacted price. It is reported verbatim and excluded from any market interpretation.
• Bullet copy is abridged. Trailing marketing clauses that steer the product toward intimate activity have been removed; the clinical and usage wording is reproduced as published.
• The listing describes external use on vulvar skin and states the product is not intended for internal use. This dossier treats it as an external barrier balm throughout and makes no claim beyond the labelled purpose.
• Ratings, prices and sales ranks move between captures; every figure here describes the snapshot date only.
• Ingredient grades are community-database aggregates used as a reference, not a regulatory or dermatological verdict. Formulas are reformulated without notice and the carton is the authoritative text.
• No reviewer name, handle, profile link or other identifier appears anywhere in this report.